Stat |
Rank data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/15755/157550274288ef937d59131d225a88aab29926be" alt="Order Desc" |
Date |
Comment |
|
7/34 |
09-03-07 |
Got it with my 2:22:40. |
|
7/34 |
10-24-07 |
Got it with my 2:06:58!! |
|
3/35 |
12-20-07 |
This was really fun, I wanna do it again!! |
|
2/68 |
09-23-24 |
I always suspected 47k being possible, but it was only when I saw on CyberScore that someone had 46830 compared to 46290. So I re-did this and got some better results!! :D |
|
1/40 |
05-21-08 |
46k at last!! |
|
1/45 |
01-25-09 |
Forgot that I got this with my 1:45:95 time!! :D |
|
1/52 |
06-17-10 |
I always suspected 47k being possible, but it was only when I saw on CyberScore that someone had 46830 compared to 46290. So I re-did this and got some better results!! :D |
|
1/35 |
01-13-08 |
YES!! YES!! YES!! |
|
1/57 |
08-17-12 |
I always suspected 47k being possible, but it was only when I saw on CyberScore that someone had 46830 compared to 46290. So I re-did this and got some better results!! :D |
|
1/41 |
06-30-08 |
46k at last!! |
|
1/45 |
01-27-09 |
Forgot that I got this with my 1:45:95 time!! :D |
|
1/38 |
03-25-08 |
46k at last!! |
|
1/53 |
12-29-10 |
I always suspected 47k being possible, but it was only when I saw on CyberScore that someone had 46830 compared to 46290. So I re-did this and got some better results!! :D |
|
1/36 |
01-18-08 |
YES!! YES!! YES!! |
|
1/57 |
08-17-12 |
I always suspected 47k being possible, but it was only when I saw on CyberScore that someone had 46830 compared to 46290. So I re-did this and got some better results!! :D |
|
1/41 |
07-21-08 |
46k at last!! |
|
1/53 |
01-09-11 |
I always suspected 47k being possible, but it was only when I saw on CyberScore that someone had 46830 compared to 46290. So I re-did this and got some better results!! :D |
|
1/36 |
01-20-08 |
YES!! YES!! YES!! |
|
1/57 |
09-03-12 |
I always suspected 47k being possible, but it was only when I saw on CyberScore that someone had 46830 compared to 46290. So I re-did this and got some better results!! :D |
|
1/42 |
08-25-08 |
46k at last!! |
|
1/52 |
06-25-11 |
I always suspected 47k being possible, but it was only when I saw on CyberScore that someone had 46830 compared to 46290. So I re-did this and got some better results!! :D |
|
1/37 |
01-21-08 |
YES!! YES!! YES!! |
|
1/58 |
11-30-13 |
I always suspected 47k being possible, but it was only when I saw on CyberScore that someone had 46830 compared to 46290. So I re-did this and got some better results!! :D |
|
1/42 |
08-25-08 |
46k at last!! |
|
1/52 |
06-25-11 |
I always suspected 47k being possible, but it was only when I saw on CyberScore that someone had 46830 compared to 46290. So I re-did this and got some better results!! :D |
|
1/37 |
03-08-08 |
46k at last!! |
|
1/59 |
01-20-14 |
I always suspected 47k being possible, but it was only when I saw on CyberScore that someone had 46830 compared to 46290. So I re-did this and got some better results!! :D |
|
1/43 |
08-29-08 |
46k at last!! |
|
1/50 |
01-19-10 |
I always suspected 47k being possible, but it was only when I saw on CyberScore that someone had 46830 compared to 46290. So I re-did this and got some better results!! :D |
|
1/37 |
03-21-08 |
46k at last!! |
|
1/60 |
10-21-14 |
I always suspected 47k being possible, but it was only when I saw on CyberScore that someone had 46830 compared to 46290. So I re-did this and got some better results!! :D |
|
1/44 |
11-09-08 |
46k at last!! |
|
1/50 |
04-20-10 |
I always suspected 47k being possible, but it was only when I saw on CyberScore that someone had 46830 compared to 46290. So I re-did this and got some better results!! :D |
|
1/35 |
12-20-07 |
YES!! YES!! YES!! |
|
1/57 |
07-12-12 |
I always suspected 47k being possible, but it was only when I saw on CyberScore that someone had 46830 compared to 46290. So I re-did this and got some better results!! :D |
|
1/40 |
05-04-08 |
46k at last!! |
|
1/51 |
05-29-10 |
I always suspected 47k being possible, but it was only when I saw on CyberScore that someone had 46830 compared to 46290. So I re-did this and got some better results!! :D |
|
1/34 |
12-23-07 |
YES!! YES!! YES!! |
|
1/57 |
07-24-12 |
I always suspected 47k being possible, but it was only when I saw on CyberScore that someone had 46830 compared to 46290. So I re-did this and got some better results!! :D |